<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Jesus Image Found</title>
	<link>http://blog.betz.org/religion/another-jesus-image-found</link>
	<description>a journey through the very ordinary</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://blog.betz.org/religion/another-jesus-image-found#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.betz.org/religion/another-jesus-image-found#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... Objective is certainly what I wouldn't call you. The white part is the "heart area"? How do you get that from an objective point of view? When is the last time you have seen a "heart area" glow like that? Perhaps in some religious art you have seen?

Secondly, he looks "darker" that most of the white people you know? How do you get that from a fairly black and white image. I was talking about the facial features rather than the tone of the skin. Perhaps I should have used the word "Caucasian" in place of "white" for my description. Maybe that wouldn't have confused you?

I, personally, see long flowing hair surrounding the face. But that is the beauty of matrixing. We all see something slightly different. :) Thanks for proving my point.

Lastly, I find it a bit sad that you missed the whole point of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; Objective is certainly what I wouldn&#8217;t call you. The white part is the &#8220;heart area&#8221;? How do you get that from an objective point of view? When is the last time you have seen a &#8220;heart area&#8221; glow like that? Perhaps in some religious art you have seen?</p>
<p>Secondly, he looks &#8220;darker&#8221; that most of the white people you know? How do you get that from a fairly black and white image. I was talking about the facial features rather than the tone of the skin. Perhaps I should have used the word &#8220;Caucasian&#8221; in place of &#8220;white&#8221; for my description. Maybe that wouldn&#8217;t have confused you?</p>
<p>I, personally, see long flowing hair surrounding the face. But that is the beauty of matrixing. We all see something slightly different. <img src='http://blog.betz.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Thanks for proving my point.</p>
<p>Lastly, I find it a bit sad that you missed the whole point of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy</title>
		<link>http://blog.betz.org/religion/another-jesus-image-found#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.betz.org/religion/another-jesus-image-found#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I think you are doing a little matrixing yourself. I certainly wouldn't call the face of the image white when I look at it objectively. The white part is in the heart area. I don't see flowing hair  and I can't tell that he is a tall, thin, white man. He looks darker than most white people I know... Maybe you are under the influence of the paradigm of the tall, thin, white man with flowing hair??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are doing a little matrixing yourself. I certainly wouldn&#8217;t call the face of the image white when I look at it objectively. The white part is in the heart area. I don&#8217;t see flowing hair  and I can&#8217;t tell that he is a tall, thin, white man. He looks darker than most white people I know&#8230; Maybe you are under the influence of the paradigm of the tall, thin, white man with flowing hair??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
